WIP6:允许核心开发团队加速提案进程

1 、前言

提案编号:WIP6
提案名称:允许核心开发团队加速提案进程
提案作者:Core Devs
有关提案:WIP0
替换提案:无

2 、摘要

本提案中,核心开发团队提议社区允许核心开发团队发起提案时,根据具体情况,适当缩短讨论期和投票期,以应对紧急情况。

3 、动机

核心开发团队收到来自社区的普遍反馈,由于目前完成一次提案所需的时间较长,导致治理效率偏低。为了 WePiggy 协议将来可以更好地适应市场变化,及时做出最快和最优的治理,建议允许核心开发团队根据提案的内容,调整提案讨论期,以及投票期的时间,以加速治理进程。

4 、正文

根据 WIP0 提案中的规定,WePiggy 的基本治理流程,如下图所示:

提案讨论期的时长没有明确规定,默认为 3 天,或更长;

提案投票期的时长为 2 天。

核心开发团队提议:由核心开发团队所发起的提案,提案讨论期的时长定为 1-3天,提案投票期的时长为 1-3 天。

具体时间,根据提案的具体情况而定,并会在提案当中进行说明。

4.3 选项

1、支持
2、反对

--------In English----------

WIP6: Allow the core development team to accelerate the proposal process

1. Preamble

Proposal Number: WIP6
Proposal Title: Allow the core development team to accelerate the proposal process
Proposal Author(s): Core Devs
Related Proposals / Dependencies: WIP0
Replacement Proposal / Replaces: N/A

2. Abstract

In this proposal, the core development team hopes the community can allow the core development team to appropriately shorten the duration of the Proposal Discussion Stage and the Proposal Voting Stage to deal with emergencies according to the specific conditions of the proposal.

3. Motivation

The core development team has received general feedback from the community. At present, it takes a long time to complete a proposal, resulting in low governance efficiency.

In order that the WePiggy protocol can better adapt to market changes in the future and make the fastest and optimal governance promptly, it is recommended that the core development team be allowed to adjust the duration of the Proposal Discussion Stage and the Proposal Voting Stage according to the content of the proposal to accelerate the governance process.

4. Specification

According to the statement in the WIP0 proposal, WePiggy’s basic governance process is shown in the following figure:

The duration of the Proposal Discussion Stage was not clearly specified, and the default was 3 days or longer;

The duration of the Proposal Voting Stage was 2 days.

The core development team propose that:

For proposals initiated by the core development team,the duration of the Proposal Discussion Stage is 1-3 days, and the duration of the Proposal Voting Stage is 1-3 days.

The specific duration depends on the specific conditions of the proposal and will be explained in the proposal.

4.3 Option description

Option 1: For
Option 2: Against

5 Likes

1,这个适当缩短最好是举出一个稍微具体一点时间来,然后规定一下最短讨论时间?

1 Like

最短讨论时间是1天。例子:

上线某种有强烈需求的借贷资产,满足用户需求,抢占市场热度;

调整某个资产的挖矿权重,刺激用户存入更多,提升市场占有率;

某个资产的基本面发生比较大的变动,调整资产质押率等参数;

……

2 Likes

支持,提高决策权

1 Like

议会2天-投票2天-决议2天

1 Like

I Am for the proposal 1. Feel that acting accordingly to the haste needed makes sense. Also at this stage of protocol speed makes sense on some matters.

2 Likes

1、支持,提升决策效率

1 Like

凡事有轻重缓急,有一些很重要又需要马上解决的问题,比如纠错,像compound之前UNI的利率模型用稳定币的模型,那玩意不赶紧纠正怎么行。当然,这种错误尽量不要犯。。

核心开发团队的提案没道理搞一些明显有问题的东西上去,又不是cream那种项目,搞一堆垃圾币去把别人的以太,大饼借走的那种行事风格,事出必有因。

所以,只要说清楚原因,我觉得问题不大。

最快速度是不是讨论1天,投票1天,timelock也有2天时间,也就是说,一个提案从发出来到代码层面的执行也是至少需要4天时间的。所以只要通知义务做到了,正常人还是可以很好的洞悉事态的,未来可以考虑加邮箱提示,用以更新动态,就更稳了

1 Like

如果你是关心小猪发展的社区成员,我认为四天的时间,完全足够让你了解事情的发展并表达自己的意见。支持提案

支持!根据市场突发状况可以适当灵活切换。

支持,小猪很稳

1 支持 牛逼